|
|
|
|
|
Early Plateau Culture (Précis, Chapter 10)
In the first synthesis of the archaeology
of a portion of the Southern Plateau
(Sanger 1969;
1970) it was proposed that
people with a Southwestern Coastal culture (Cordilleran) moved into the
area from the south around 9,000 B.P. Their tool kit consisted of
bipointed projectile points and knives, linear flakes, cobble core and
spall tools, and distinctive concave-faced end scrapers. Microblade
technology was absent. This initial occupation was then replaced by the
Nesikep tradition (Early Plateau culture) with its microblade technology
and notched projectile points. The Nesikep tradition was believed to
have moved south from the central interior of British Columbia around
7,500 B.P. The evidence supporting an initial occupation by Southwestern
Coastal culture was equivocal at the time of this first synthesis and
still is. By 11,500 to 10,500 B.P. glacial ice had disappeared from the
Southern Plateau and grasslands-sagebrush occupied the valley bottoms
with trees on the uplands and valley sides. Warmer and drier conditions
began by 10,500 B.P. and lasted until 6,500 B.P.
(Stryd and Rousseau: In
press). Evidence for even a limited occupation by Palaeo-Indian
culture or the ambiguous Stemmed Point tradition at this time is still
not convincing. Some evidence for a penetration by Plano culture from
the east is apparent but it was weak and concentrated in the
southeastern portion of the Plateau. As detailed archaeological
reports become available it may develop that the Kootenai region of
the southeastern Southern Plateau was closely affiliated with the
Plains at this early time period. Others would argue for a pre-Mazama
ash fall occupation by the Stemmed Point tradition (Goatfell complex)
with origins in the Columbia Plateau and the Great Basin
(Choquette 1987: 330).
|
|
Early Plateau Culture Implements
The thin, carefully flaked
corner-notched and triangular points were associated with
microblades in the 4,500 B.C. level of the Nesikep Creek site on
the Fraser River. Below is an illustration of a microblade
core and dorsal and lateral views of a microblade with their
descriptive terms.
(Reproduced from Sanger 1970:
Figures 24 and 26 with permission of Dr. David Sanger, University of
Maine at Orono. Drawings by Mr. David W. Laverie.)
|
|
Microblade Core Terms
1 Striking Platform |
2 Edge Chord |
3 Core Edge |
4 Fluted Surface |
5 Lateral Surfaces |
6 Keel |
7 Front |
8 Back
|
|
Microblade Terms
1 Proximal End (Striking Platform) |
2 Area of Battering |
3 Bulb of Percussion |
4 Lateral Edge "Right" |
5 Arris |
6 Distal End |
7 Dorsal Surface |
8 Ventral Surface
|
|
In another synthesis (Fladmark 1982:
112) it is argued that there is no solid evidence for an initial occupation
by Southwestern Coastal culture people and that the assemblage which had
been earlier attributed to this culture actually dates to Period III (4,000
to 1,000 B.C.). Further, it is proposed that the earliest occupation
actually was represented by people with a microblade technology who moved
up the Fraser River from the coast rather than out of the central interior.
"The prior occurrence of microblades on the Northern and Central Northwest
Coast suggests that this technology may have originally penetrated the
southern British Columbia Interior from the west, rather than southwards
from the Yukon"
(Fladmark 1982: 128). This
hypothesized population movement has been correlated with the expansion of
salmon spawning ranges into the interior
(Carlson 1979: 222-223;
1990: 66). The most recent synthesis
(Stryd and Rousseau: In
press) proposes that the earliest occupation was by a number of
different cultures represented by Palaeo-Indian, Stemmed Point,
Northwestern Coastal (Early Coastal Microblade), and Southwestern Coastal
(Cordilleran or Old Cordilleran) cultures. The phase regarded in Sanger's
synthesis as the earliest occupation is now treated in Stryd and Rousseau
as a late penetration from the coast into the interior beginning near the
end of Period II (4,250 B.C.).
The problem faced by all of the preceding syntheses relative to the
initial occupation of the Southern Plateau is that a human antiquity
in the interior equivalent to that of other regions has generally not
been demonstrated by either excavation or radiocarbon dating. In lieu of
direct evidence, hypotheses have been supported by typological
cross-dating using a number of tool varieties which are now known to have
limited diagnostic value
(Stryd and Rousseau: In
press). Recent evidence
(Rousseau 1991) indicates that
the first significant occupation of the Southern Plateau probably came
from the northern interior and involved a culture whose tool kit was
dominated by a microblade technology. The earliest occupation of the
multi-component Landels site by Early Plateau culture has been dated to
8,500 B.P. The date is contemporaneous with the Gore Creek human remains
discovered a short distance to the east on the same drainage system. No
artifacts were found with this adult male who died accidentally in a
mudslide. Solid carbon isotope analysis, however, revealed that his
consumption of marine foods, such as anadromous salmon and steelhead,
was relatively insignificant. Such evidence compromises the proposition
that microblade technology was introduced into the interior from the
west by coastal people following the expanding spawning ranges of
salmon. Further, evidence of a specialized microblade technology on
the Southern Coast is absent
(Fladmark 1982: 112). Thus,
the chronology of syntheses relating to the earliest occupants appears
to have come full circle and returned to an early hypothesis which
stated that the microblade users who occupied the Southern Plateau
originated in the northern interior
(Borden 1975). This would
imply a close relationship between Early Plateau culture and Early
Northwest Interior culture. There is also no reason to assume that
the 8,500 B.P. date from the Landels site represents the earliest
evidence of the peopling of the Southern Plateau. Certainly prior
to 9,000 B.P. the region was available for colonization
(McAndrews et al. 1987).
|
|
|
|