In what is admittedly a gross generalization, the archaeology
of the entire region during Period IV (1,000 B.C. to A.D. 500)
has been divided into western and eastern complexes with the
Mackenzie River Valley acting as an intervening and poorly
understood buffer between the two. It could be that "...the
western District of Mackenzie may be intergradational between
the Yukon and the central District of Mackenzie
(cf. Morrison 1984)"
(Clark 1987: 188). The
complexes are the Taye Lake complex to the west and the
Taltheilei complex to the east. In this instance, the
catch-all classification "complex" is used to reflect the
uncertainty of the relationship between Taye Lake and
Taltheilei. Taye Lake has the greatest time depth, extending
well into Period III (4,000 to 1,000 B.C.) and likely earlier,
while the Taltheilei complex was the product of an exceptional
eastward movement of people, likely coming out of northeastern
British Columbia and the adjacent Yukon Territory via the Peace
River and the Liard River, both major tributaries of the
Mackenzie River. This population movement extended 1,500 km
east of the Mackenzie River nearly to Hudson Bay, north to the
coast of the Arctic Ocean and south into the northern reaches
of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. Despite the exceptional
geographic magnitude of the migration it has, for unknown
reasons, not attracted the attention of many scholars.
Perhaps as an event that took place in the barrengrounds
and northern forests it has been too isolated from southern
considerations and lacked the romance of the Arctic.
Appearing in the barrengrounds of Keewatin District around
700 B.C. during a warming climate, the Taltheilei complex's
most intensive occupation of these territories, formally
occupied by Early Palaeo-Eskimo culture, appears to have
occurred toward the end of Period IV
(Gordon 1996).
Both the Taye Lake and Taltheilei complexes have regional
facies and, while they share a number of traits, there are
differences between the two. In one sense, it might have
been more appropriate to regard the two complexes as
cultural traditions which bifurcated from one another
early in Period IV. A detailed consideration of the
relationship between the two complexes is severely
inhibited by the lack of archaeological information from
both northern British Columbia and the Mackenzie River
Valley. For the purposes of this exercise, the two complexes
are used as gross archaeological constructs that have some
internal coherence but whose relationship to one another as
component parts of a Late Northwest Interior culture is not
yet demonstrable. In a number of respects, Late Interior
Northwest culture, as was the case with Late West Coast
culture, can best be compared to a fabric whereby the
vertical warps or local technological traditions are held
together by the horizontal wefts of widely shared tool
styles and other traits. The fabric of Late Northwest
Interior culture, however, is even more shredded than that
of the Pacific coast. Part of the problem facing
archaeologists is that the technology of Late Northwest
Interior culture would have been dominated by objects made
from wood, bark, hide, sinew, and other perishable objects (see
Rogers and Smith 1981).
Even bone rarely survives the acid soils that characterize
much of the region, especially in the Canadian Shield.
Many of the tool categories traditionally used to
reconstruct culture history, such as microblades and
notched points, have what can only be called a whimsical
distribution in both time and space in northwestern
North America. A recent approach that holds promise
for clarifying aspects of the culture history is the
detailed study of stone reduction processes to produce
expedient flake tools and tool blanks. These studies
include consideration of such attributes as the varieties
of platform preparation and angles of flake detachment
(Gotthardt 1990;
LeBlanc 1984).
In truth, the simple stone flake was undoubtedly the
most important implement in the Northwest Interior
culture tool kit. Stone core forms and methods of flake
detachment would have been deeply engrained culturally
learned behaviour and may well, in the long run, prove
to be more informative than the finished tools that
archaeologists have relied upon to reconstruct culture
history. Innovative methods of analyses are certainly
required if the situation whereby "...seldom have so
many looked so hard to find so little"
(Workman 1983: 87)
is to be remedied.
The Taye Lake complex is often assigned to the Northern
Archaic, a cultural construct that is being increasingly
rejected or qualified as its hypothetical underpinnings
cannot accommodate the evidence
(Clark 1992: 79;
Morrison 1987;
Wright 1995: 386).
Assigned to the Taye Lake complex in this work are the Old
Chief Creek phase of the northern Yukon and the Taye Lake
phase of the southern Yukon. This is not an original proposal
(Greer and LeBlanc 1983: 33).
The Old Chief Creek phase is believed to lead to Kutchin
Athapascans and the Taye Lake phase of the southwestern
Yukon to relate to the Tutchone Athapaskans. Dated between
1,000 B.C. and A.D. 700, the closest relationship of the
Old Chief Creek phase is seen to be with the Taye Lake phase
(LeBlanc 1984: 437).
Shared traits are lanceolate points, large biface knives,
scraper forms, chithos, rare wedges and cobble spalls, and
an absence of microblades. Flake burins, present in the
south, however, are absent in the north. Similarly, the
Callison site in northern British Columbia is equated with
the Taye Lake complex
(MacNeish 1960: 1;
Workman 1978: 417)
along with the MacKenzie complex of Fishermans Lake in the
southwestern Northwest Territories
(Millar 1968). Shared
traits are lanceolate points, flake burins, and scraper forms
including notched varieties.
Although the term 'Taltheilei' was introduced by MacNeish
(1951), the complex
was first defined by Noble
(1971;
1981) on the basis of
a series of assemblages recovered from elevated strandlines
at the east end of Great Slave Lake. Noble's Taltheilei Shale
tradition was composed of a number of early to late phases
that terminated with the historically documented Yellowknife
Athapaskans although the Chipewyan and Dogrib Indians and
possibly other groups were undoubtedly involved in the same
complex. For Period IV this sequence of phases included
Hennessey to Taltheilei to Windy Point. Paradoxically, due
in large part to the funnelling effect of caribou migration
routes and repetitively used river-lake crossings on human
settlement, sites in the barrengrounds have tended to
produce larger numbers of implements than their western
contemporaries. Large stratified sites are not uncommon and,
thus, in many respects, the nature of Taltheilei complex
technology is better known (e.g.
Gordon 1996) than
that of the Taye Lake complex.
Caribou were of critical importance to Late Northwest Interior
culture, not only for meat but also for hides, sinew, bone,
and antler. While fish were of great importance, particularly
in the fall and early winter as winter storage food, dog food,
and a resource of last resort, without the caribou there would
have been no people. The same comment could be made relative
to fish as it was the combination of caribou and fish that were
essential to survival. Other foods were, for the most part,
supplementary to these two primary foods. Winter food was
particularly important in a land of short summers with 24 hours
of daylight and winters with 6 daylight hours and frequent food
shortages. Caribou even appear to have influenced human birth
in the east where "...four out of five births in February,
March and April in the winter-range forest - nine months after
massed herds were intercepted at tundra water crossings, nine
months after nutritionally fit caribou provided adequate fat
to allow Dene women to conceive"
(Gordon 1996: iii).
East of a line cutting through Great Bear and Great Slave
lakes and Lake Athabasca are a number of discrete herds of
barrenground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus)
while to the west and south of this range woodland caribou
(Rangifer tarandus caribou) prevail except in the
northern Yukon and adjacent Alaska where another barrenground
or tundra subspecies is represented (Rangifer tarandus
granti)
(Banfield 1961:
Figures 5 and 6). The major herds making up the eastern
barrenground caribou have specific calving areas to the
north of their wintering ranges and definite migration
routes between the two and thus there is a correlation
between traditional caribou river and lake crossings and
past human occupations. As a general observation it can be
stated that the majority of site locations are either directly
related to caribou or fish or both, albeit with seasonal
emphases. High mobility during the warm weather and more
sedentary settlement during the winter would have characterized
the settlement patterns of all of the region under consideration.
There is very little archaeological evidence that can be
related to either cosmology or human biology. Early
historically documented treatment of the deceased usually
involved surface burial whereby little can be expected to
survive. European observers who commented on the apparent
absence of religious ceremony among various northern
Athapascan people undoubtedly did not appreciate the
importance of personal power, spirit helpers, and the complex
and all important relationship between humans and animals.
Nor would they have been aware of the importance of dreams
to influence behaviour. Shamans, people with exceptional
powers who could act as emissaries between individuals and the
supernatural world, represented one of the few instances where
assistance, beyond personal power and adherence to taboos,
could be sought.
Relationships with their neighbours at the time of European
contact involved hostilities with the Inuit to the north
and the Cree to the southeast. In Period IV, cultural
distributions were the same in the western region as during
Period V but to the east a major cultural replacement took
place. When the Taltheilei complex spread eastward throughout
the enormous territory it would eventually occupy it replaced
Early Palaeo-Eskimo culture. It is not yet clear whether
this replacement involving filling a void left by contracting
Palaeo-Eskimos or if the latter were pushed-out. The time gap
between the latest Palaeo-Eskimos in the barrengrounds and
the appearance of the earliest Taltheilei complex hunters is
narrow. As is clearly demonstrated by the archaeological
record, both cultures occupied the same sites and for the
same reasons - caribou. There are no compelling reasons,
such as climate change, to explain why the Palaeo-Eskimos
would be inclined to voluntarily abandon rich hunting
territories that they had been exploiting since 1,500 B.C.
Caribou had not altered their habits as indicated by the fact
that all cultures on the barrengrounds, from earliest to
latest times, occupied the same sites. It is speculated that
east of the Mackenzie River Valley much of the territories
occupied by the Taltheilei complex involved the displacement
of what were likely seasonally resident Palaeo-Eskimos.
Similarly, Early Palaeo-Eskimos disappeared from the northern
regions of Alaska, the Yukon, and the northwestern area of
the District of Mackenzie. Direct evidence of hostilities
can rarely be recognized in the archaeological record and
given the kind of relatively small, hit-and-run warfare
documented by Europeans for the region, little such
evidence could be expected. What is clear from the
archaeological record (e.g.
Gordon 1996: Figure 8.1
versus Figure 5.1;
McGhee 1987: Plate 11)
is that Late Northwest Interior culture, as represented by the
Taltheilei complex in the east and presumably the Taye Lake
complex and/or related complexes in the west, replaced
Palaeo-Eskimo culture throughout much of its former range in
the northern reaches of the western Subarctic and adjacent
barrengrounds.
Late Northwest Interior culture societies, like that of their
descendants in Period V, would have been composed of a number
of families grouped into regional bands and, of secondary
importance, band groupings that constituted a loose tribal
structure. Within these egalitarian societies considerable
flexibility of individual choice would have existed. The
importance of the highly mobile, small family unit is clearly
evident from the generally meagre archaeological remains.
Polygamy was wide spread at the time of European contact
although few men could have afforded to support more than
one wife. The nature of the archaeological record is such
that it is likely impossible to determine how old or
prevalent this practice was.
|