Southwestern Coastal Culture (Précis, Chapter 11)
The term 'Southwestern Coastal culture'
is used instead of previous terms, such as Old Cordilleran culture
(Butler 1961;
Fladmark 1982;
Matson 1976), the Pebble
Tool tradition
(Carlson 1983;
1990), and the Olcott complex
(Nelson 1990), in order to
accommodate the geographic-habitat based culture nomenclature followed
in this work. Less frequently used other names for the culture under
consideration are Early Lithic culture
(Mitchell 1971) and the
Protowestern tradition
(Borden 1975). There is a
controversy whether Southwestern Coastal culture and its contemporary
along the coast, Northwestern Coastal culture, represent geographic
variations of a single culture or were two distinctly different
cultures, one that originated from Palaeo-Indian in the south and
spread north along the coast while the other, an off-shoot of
Northwestern Palaeo-Arctic culture in Beringia, spread southward
down the coast. There is also the debate whether Southwestern Coastal
culture was an interior culture that moved to the coast or was a
coastal culture that spread up the major river valleys into the
interior or alternatively, possessed both maritime and interior
adaptations. Evidence relating to this initial human occupation of
the southern coast indicates that a sophisticated maritime adaptation
was in place by 10,000 B.P.
A resolution of the controversy surrounding the origin(s) and
relationships of Southwestern Coastal culture and Northwestern Coastal
culture are critical to any appreciation of the formation of West
Coast culture. Some regard the Palaeo-Indian derived transitional
cultures in the Great Basin- Columbia-Snake River region as being
unrelated to contemporary developments along the coast to the north
and, in particular, on the lower Fraser River
(Carlson 1988: 322). Others
regard Southwestern Coastal culture as being part of a broad cultural
differentiation from Palaeo-Indian culture into a number of
geographically confined and regionally distinctive cultures
(Willig and Aikens 1988:
Table 3). While it does appear that cultural developments in southern
British Columbia were distinct in a number of important respects from
those of the Columbia Plateau of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, the
area still appears to have participated in a widely distributed
technological pattern. South of British Columbia various dimensions
of this technological pattern have been classified as the San Dieguito
horizon (Aikens 1978), the
Western Pluvial Lakes tradition
(Bedwell 1973), and the
Stemmed Point tradition (Carlson 1983).
The central issue is whether Southwestern Coastal culture shared
its origins with other regional cultures that developed out of a
Palaeo-Indian cultural base or whether it was a product of a
southward movement of people down the coast of British Columbia
from the North Pacific. Evidence relating to a sophisticated large
sea mammal hunting capability and, more tentatively, the historic
linguistic diversity of coastal British Columbia has been used to
support the northern origin hypothesis. At this point in time a
southern origin of Southwestern Coastal culture
(Borden 1975) would appear
to be more probable.
Within Southwestern Coastal culture technology the bifacially flaked
bipointed projectile point is regarded as the major diagnostic
artifact of "... an unspecialized hunting-gathering culture which
appeared on the scene in the Pacific Northwest at or near the end of
the Late Pleistocene. This culture, which I shall now refer to as the
Old Cordilleran culture, appears to have been a widespread, basal
culture in the area, ranging from the maritime province of the Puget
Sound southward to the Northern Great Basin and eastward into the
Columbia Basin, and possibly into eastern Idaho"
(Butler 1961: 63). Butler
regarded Old Cordilleran culture as a contemporary of Palaeo-Indian
culture although sites generally date from 10,000 to 8,500 B.P. or
later. Much of the difficulty in attempting to demonstrate the
distribution of Southwestern Coastal culture can be attributed to
its relatively simple tool kit containing artifact categories that
are also found in much later cultures. The assemblage consists
primarily of cobble core and spall tools and bipointed projectile
points and knives, none of which are necessarily diagnostic of an
early time period. The situation is then compounded by the scarcity
of excavated sites and discrete components. Ground stone implements
are either absent or rare as are bone implements. The few bone
implements from the Glenrose Cannery site in the Fraser Delta
(Matson 1976), for example,
consisted of a single fixed barbed harpoon and a number of antler
wedges, the latter being suggestive of wood-working. Evidence to
the south in Oregon does indicate that the spearthrower may have
been in use at this time.
Faunal evidence from coastal sites indicates a seasonal round that
exploited both terrestrial and maritime resources but made relatively
little use of intertidal food sources such as shellfish. The Bear
Cove site on the north end of Vancouver Island
(C. Carlson 1979), for
example, contained high frequencies of dolphin, porpoise, and sea
lion, thus providing strong support for the proposal that
Southwestern Coastal culture possessed sea-worthy watercraft and
the technology and knowledge necessary to capture large sea mammals.
In contrast, in the Fraser River Canyon the location of the Milliken
site suggests that salmon were captured in the rapids using some
form of dip-net
(Borden 1961). Given the
complex nature of the topography of coastal British Columbia and
its highly variable resources it is likely that the adaptive
strategy of Southwestern Coastal culture was fine-tuned to all
available foods, maritime and terrestrial. Even the limited
evidence of the use of intertidal resources could prove to be more
a product of limitations in archaeological sampling and preservation
than any culturally motivated indifference to the rich resources of
this ecotone. The suggestion that a diffuse adaptive subsistence
system prevailed rather than a focal one is also supported by the
highly variable settlement patterns which involved the utilization of
a number of different environmental niches. Site locations range from
sea mammal hunting and fishing camps situated on exposed coastal
beaches to interior riverine locations adjacent to rapids with their
seasonal migrating salmon. Features of any kind at these campsites
are rare and tend to have been disturbed or, in many instances,
probably destroyed by flood waters or ocean storms.
The impression that Southwestern Coastal culture in southern British
Columbia involved small populations of mobile hunting and fishing
bands is certain to have been heightened by the processes of
sea-level fluctuations, tectonic forces, and soil erosion and
deposition that have either destroyed sites or markedly reduced
their archaeological visibility. At 8,000 B.P., for example, the
high tide along the south coast was between 10 m to 15 m
lower than present and did not reach its present level until
shortly before the end of Period II
(Mathews 1979). Many
Southwestern Coastal culture ocean beach campsites during this time
period would, of course, have been destroyed or drowned.
|